Pin It

Join almost 1/2 million
monthly
readers!

Contact Me

Coaching and Consultation

Current mission

Secret project in
Berlin! Subscribe to
email list to find out
about it first!

Previous post:

Next post:

Mini-goals are the path to achieving fluency

| 37 comments | Category: learning languages

Goals

I am continuing from yesterday’s post about how Redefining your Motivation can give you new things to aim for in the long-run; by going a step further and looking entirely at the short term. When we think of goals, we may think of something to work towards over a long period of time that you can reach and feel that immense sense of achievement when you do. I’m way too impatient to wait for such validation. I want to feel a sense of achievement NOW! :) On top of this, a long-term goal can lead to an inefficient structure in trying to reach it.

Give yourself a time limit!

I have met so many people who have been studying a language for years and never actually made much progress, or are otherwise just about maintaining their plateau of speaking pretty well and never improving. If your goal is to speak language X fluently “some day”, then you may never even achieve that goal, very simply because “some day” does not actually exist, and will always be some blurry point in the distance.

Normally, I’m not a fan of the overly academic approaches to learning languages, but one advantage that a lot of them have is their use of examinations (what I like about the CEFR exams mentioned in yesterday’s post is that you don’t have to follow any particular course to do the examinations if you don’t want to). Some people dread examinations and wish they weren’t there, but the concept is great for motivating you to doing some work; you have a particular day and you must have learned a certain amount by that day.

Nevertheless, those that only happen at the end of the academic year have the well known situation where a lot of people don’t do any work most of the year (in university for example) or take it easy and then cram in the days/weeks leading up to their exams… and yet they get the results they need! This is a classic example of work expanding to fill the time allocated to it. Think of what these same people could achieve if they had their efficient study period several times a year, or even several times a week! You don’t have to be a genius, you just need the right motivation.

Now, I’ve “randomly” assigned myself 3 months to become fluent in Czech. Time (and this blog) will tell whether I achieve this or not, but I will definitely achieve much more than a lot of people would in 3 months, in terms of progress in the language, simply because of having invented this time limit and always having it in mind; forcing me to learn more in a shorter time. If work expands to fill the time allocated to it, then the opposite is also true! Someone commented about my “experiment” of at least having the result of me “aiming for the moon and landing on the stars”, so no matter what, I’ll have achieved quite a lot after my time here if I am serious about my “overall” goal. I think I still have a good chance at achieving this goal of ‘fluency’ though; you’ll see what I mean in my next post. But even 3 months can be too big a time span! We need to look at the shorter term…

Smaller and specific goals all add up over time

The problem with something like the standard examination system is that it forces you to follow someone else’s timetable and structure, and of course there’s the fact that you may have just one exam at the end of the year instead of several throughout the year. However, when I learn a language I like to set myself a very large number of mini-goals with very short time limits. None of these goals in themselves are particularly impressive or difficult to achieve, but they all add up over time to speaking a language fluently.

Instead of just saying that you want to be fluent “some day” (or even in my case where I am picking 3 months) and hoping that it will naturally (or magically) happen, you should set yourself very specific goals in short periods of time. Below you will see a few ways you might do this; i.e. changing your long-term “unachievable” goal into smaller daily or weekly goals that you can finish completely and feel that sense of achievement immediately. All of these have worked for me at various stages in learning languages when trying to improve on my weak points:

BAD GOAL: “Eventually” have a good command of general vocabulary.

GOOD GOAL: Learn words for objects in the kitchen (for example) by 5pm and have someone test you to make sure that you remember. Then select a new theme for the next day, but come back to this one next week to make sure that you haven’t forgotten what you learned.

BAD GOAL: Speak fluently some day.

GOOD GOAL: Be able to repeat learned off phrases by the end of the first day, then be able to form your own basic (grammatically incorrect) sentences at the end of the first week, and then make a new plan.

BAD GOAL: Speak with a very slight (or preferably no) accent.

GOOD GOAL: Work on rolling your ‘r’ for the next 3 days like they do in the target language, getting as many tips about this one sound and mouth/tongue positioning from others as you can. Train yourself and repeat the sound as often as possible. Then ask people what other sounds distinguish your English accent and work on them one at a time.

Can you see what I’m getting at here? These goals have very tight time limits (within a few hours, or at most days) and they are definitely achievable by mere mortals who don’t need to be “naturally talented with languages”. The sense of achievement is important when you are taking on such a “large” task, since it can otherwise become discouraging quickly if you focus on what you “don’t” know. In fact, it’s not that hard!! :)

“Impressive” language skills aren’t really that impressive when you break them up

The main reason people think that it’s so amazing to speak a language fluently is because they are looking at all of these aspects at once. Surely you’d have to be a genius to be able to learn thousands of new words, a new pronunciation system, understanding the spoken language and aaaaaaall of that grammar?! Here, it’s important to see the trees from the forest, so to speak, and take things in small chunks; all of which add up together surprisingly quickly! Apart from the actual benefits and doing something practical to reach your “end” goal, there is a great sense of achievement that you can feel every day in reaching your objective. There is no achievement with “fluency” because that in itself is too vague for most people, and it’s too distant to be achieved or feel any sense of achievement when it vaguely does happen (unless of course you have several longer term goals to motivate you, as I mentioned in the last post).

These mini-goals can also have a “test” at the end of the time limit (a friend seeing if you remember for example), but when you speak a language on a daily basis you don’t even need this; when the situation arises where you need to say a word / apply grammar / pronounce a letter that you learned and you fail to remember it or do it correctly, that embarrassment is a strong motivator for your next study period, and you will be a lot less likely to make the same mistake again! The words that are burned most into my memory aren’t so much the ones that I learned off the best way, but the ones that I learned once and then “should have” known it at the right time, but didn’t. The next moment when the word I need is revealed to me is the beginning of me never forgetting it again! You have to (and will) pass through the embarrassment stage a few times before your motivation not to make a mistake when learning something new becomes intrinsic to your learning process, and your embarrassment is diminished more and more over time. This is one way that you can “naturally” become good at learning and memorising things if you weren’t before. (There are other ways, that I’ll be talking about later!)

Since my goal is fluency, I should point out that for many people that is a very vague concept, and that isn’t very useful based on what I’ve discussed yesterday and today. So in my next post, I’ll be examining this concept of “fluency” in more detail. When we have a better idea what we are aiming for, we can achieve it so much easier :)

So, what do you think? Is such a “monstrously” big task of becoming fluent actually achievable when you break it up? What mini-goals have helped you learn your target language? Share it in the comments :) And if you liked this post, don’t forget to “stumbleupon” it, or share it on facebook/twitter! :D Thanks!

***********************

Enter your email in the top right of the site to subscribe to the Language Hacking League e-mail list for way more tips sent directly to your inbox!

If you enjoyed this post, you will love my TEDx talk! You can get much better details of how I recommend learning a language if you watch it here.

This article was written by

Comments: If you liked this post or have anything to say, please leave a comment! I love reading them :)
Just keep in mind that I’ll delete any rude, trolling, spammy, irrelevant or way off-topic comments. If you have a general language learning question, please ask it in the forums. Otherwise please use the search tool on the right for any other question not related to this post.

———————————–

  • mark

    hey there! good advice! no…GREAT advice. so many people mistake fluency for the ultimate goal of learning a language and they forget entirely about the communication part. can’t wait to see what you post next time regarding fluency! btw–how do you have time for Czech when you’re busy writing this great blog? :P

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ benny

      Time will be a topic I will focus an entire post on (I have a general plan of a lot of article topics already set out; enough for way more than just 3 months!!)
      Thanks for the compliments!! Much appreciated :) Writing an article like this only takes maybe about two hours though, hardly stealing my Czech learning time ;) Other “projects” are indeed giving me less Czech time though; I better get my rear in gear if I want to reach my fluency goal :D

      • Rene

        Hey Benny, I’ve been reading your posts with great interest. Great advice about setting mini-goals!
        BTW, as you write these articles, why don’t you pick up some simple words (time, entire, I have, a lot, enough, month, etc) and learn their Czech equivalents (čas, celý, mám, mnoho/ hodně, dost, měsíc) :)

  • mark

    hey there! good advice! no…GREAT advice. so many people mistake fluency for the ultimate goal of learning a language and they forget entirely about the communication part. can’t wait to see what you post next time regarding fluency! btw–how do you have time for Czech when you’re busy writing this great blog? :P

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com benny

      Time will be a topic I will focus an entire post on (I have a general plan of a lot of article topics already set out; enough for way more than just 3 months!!)
      Thanks for the compliments!! Much appreciated :) Writing an article like this only takes maybe about two hours though, hardly stealing my Czech learning time ;) Other “projects” are indeed giving me less Czech time though; I better get my rear in gear if I want to reach my fluency goal :D

      • Rene

        Hey Benny, I’ve been reading your posts with great interest. Great advice about setting mini-goals!
        BTW, as you write these articles, why don’t you pick up some simple words (time, entire, I have, a lot, enough, month, etc) and learn their Czech equivalents (čas, celý, mám, mnoho/ hodně, dost, měsíc) :)

  • April

    Pretty nice post. I just found your blog and wanted to say
    that I have really liked reading your posts. In any case
    I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ benny

      Thanks so much for the encouragement “April” :-P

  • April

    Pretty nice post. I just found your blog and wanted to say
    that I have really liked reading your posts. In any case
    I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you post again soon!

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com benny

      Thanks so much for the encouragement “April” :-P

  • Matt

    As someone moving to Prague in a year with high hopes of fluency I’m following this blog with great interest. Very useful and encouraging – keep the posts coming!

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ benny

      Prague is amazing, you’ll love it :) The video I plan on making in September will be showing some highlights of the city and I’ll give a link on this blog. The photos I include at the beginning will otherwise perhaps have some Prague images eventually!

  • Matt

    As someone moving to Prague in a year with high hopes of fluency I’m following this blog with great interest. Very useful and encouraging – keep the posts coming!

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com benny

      Prague is amazing, you’ll love it :) The video I plan on making in September will be showing some highlights of the city and I’ll give a link on this blog. The photos I include at the beginning will otherwise perhaps have some Prague images eventually!

  • http://grahamwoodring.com/ Graham

    You make some great points about the difference between realistic and unrealistic goals. Saying that “someday” you will accomplish something is just too unrealistic. Without a set deadline and parameters for your goal, it’s just too easy to let it fall by the wayside while you let other things take over your time. If you want to accomplish goals, you need to focus on them and make small, measured steps towards reaching them.

  • http://grahamwoodring.com Graham

    You make some great points about the difference between realistic and unrealistic goals. Saying that “someday” you will accomplish something is just too unrealistic. Without a set deadline and parameters for your goal, it’s just too easy to let it fall by the wayside while you let other things take over your time. If you want to accomplish goals, you need to focus on them and make small, measured steps towards reaching them.

  • Matt

    I very much agree regarding goal setting – it’s important that they are both realistic (to keep motivation) and concrete in terms of time and substance (so that progress can be objectively measured). It’s a useful lesson that applies in all endeavours.

    Looking forward to the video / photos of Prague!

  • Matt

    I very much agree regarding goal setting – it’s important that they are both realistic (to keep motivation) and concrete in terms of time and substance (so that progress can be objectively measured). It’s a useful lesson that applies in all endeavours.

    Looking forward to the video / photos of Prague!

  • Cainntear

    “BAD GOAL: Speak with a very slight (or preferably no) accent.”

    Good or bad, it’s a goal — it’s an end result, but the following is not:

    ” GOOD GOAL: Work on rolling your ‘r’ for the next 3 days like they do in the target language, getting as many tips about this one sound and mouth/tongue positioning from others as you can. Train yourself and repeat the sound as often as possible. Then ask people what other sounds distinguish your English accent and work on them one at a time.”

    You’re not describing a desired end-state, you’re describing a process to get there.

    Both of these are important, but please don’t confuse the two as you often need to alter the process to achieve the goal, but if the process *is* the goal, then you “achieve” your goal by carrying the process through, even if it fails to help you progress your language.

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ benny

      Thanks for your thoughts!
      You’re right that the end results are indeed the main goals, but I hope you see that I was trying to indicate that we should be focussed more specifically on processes that add up to those “end goals”, rather than not breaking them up into something achievable in the short-term. I’m saying that we should abandon the end-goal, just that only having that end-goal in mind (and not it’s required parts) is not beneficial.
      I suppose I am playing with semantics a bit, changing “processes” into goals. Would you recommend that I do it differently? :)

      • Cainntear

        No, I’m not saying that the end-results are the main goals, but that you can have sub-goals that are ends in themselves yet not processes.

        Take your example about knowing kitchen vocab.

        Goal: Learn the common kitchen vocabulary by 5pm

        You can then define your measure:

        Measure: Get friend to test you at 5.15. Repeat test in a week

        Once you’ve got your goal and your measure, then you can identify the steps required to achieve it.

        Steps to achieve: [...]

        Mixing goals and processes may work fine for you because you already have a routine, but as a model for readers to copy, it’s sorely lacking because the average reader doesn’t really have any experience of what you want to achieve.

        • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ benny

          Do you really think so? I don’t think experience is so necessary – I am confident that those reading this page are well able to break up huge tasks into smaller ones.
          I’m sorry, maybe I’m a bit slow today but I don’t actually understand your argument :( I honestly don’t see why having frequent processes (which I have decided to call mini-goals) could only work for me because of my “routine”… We break up large projects all the time. Tidy the house = first hoover the floor, then clean bathroom surfaces, etc. I’m just saying it can work for language processes too. It’s mostly just a mental jump I’m suggesting, no experience necessary :)

          • http://www.anthonylauder.com/ SplogSplog

            I understand what Cainntear is saying. The important point is to define your goal in terms of a measurable result you want to achieve, rather than the steps you are going to take. The goal is the “what?” whereas the process is the “how?”. If you focus mostly on the “how?” then how do you recognize you have actually achieved some result other than just spending time?

            Activities (“process” to use the fancy word) are just peddling unless you are aiming for a target and you can see when you got there.

            “Thirty minutes studying word lists” is an activity. “Learn the months of the year” is a measurable destination.

            Sure, you can break activities down into either smaller activities (“study for 15 minutes” then “take a 5 minute break” then “study for 15 minutes”) but again these are not measurable other than “I spent time on them”.

            In your “clean the house” example, you do have a goal (to have a clean house) and a measurable result (“shiny surfaces”). If you had told somebody “push a mop around for an hour” then you would be talking about activity with no way of knowing if you they achieved anything useful at the end.

            However, time-boxing can be useful to put a bit of pressure on yourself, and to stop you wasting time or getting distracted. So, if you already have a good idea of how much you can reasonably do in a set time, then you can say: “Learn the months of the year (the goal) within 30 minutes (the timebox) by studying word lists (the activity)”. This is then something measurable: “I will know I am done when I can write all 12 list pairs out for myself within one minute, and will know my retention is good enough if twelve hours later I can have a friend read out randomly the names of the months in English and I can respond with their Czech equivalents without noticeable hesitation”

          • Cainntear

            We set goals so we can evaluate the effectiveness of our strategies. If the strategy doesn’t help us achieve our goal, we pick new strategies.

            Your learning tasks are the strategy. If your goal is to follow the strategy, then you will always succeed on paper, but that’s not going to guarantee you get anywhere — you need to measure your success independently of whether you followed the process or not to achieve it.

          • http://www.fluentin3months.com/ benny

            OK, I see from your comments that maybe this method needs a little fine tuning :) I think the basic principle is important (getting satisfaction out of minor tasks or “processes” as well as having the end-goal in mind for these), but obviously there is another way of looking at it I haven’t considered. ;)
            Perhaps combining my method with what you (both) are talking about would involve a structured method of “mini-goals” with a definite plan linking them all together? Otherwise, perhaps you may not be focussing your efforts correctly if you learn something random as my post perhaps suggests.
            I thought my minigoal of a day or two was tight enough, but Iindeed a “time-box” of something very specific to achieve in 30 minutes (or particular time before break) is actually an improvement on this!
            Thanks for your input both of you!! Keep the interesting comments coming ;)

  • Cainntear

    “BAD GOAL: Speak with a very slight (or preferably no) accent.”

    Good or bad, it’s a goal — it’s an end result, but the following is not:

    ” GOOD GOAL: Work on rolling your ‘r’ for the next 3 days like they do in the target language, getting as many tips about this one sound and mouth/tongue positioning from others as you can. Train yourself and repeat the sound as often as possible. Then ask people what other sounds distinguish your English accent and work on them one at a time.”

    You’re not describing a desired end-state, you’re describing a process to get there.

    Both of these are important, but please don’t confuse the two as you often need to alter the process to achieve the goal, but if the process *is* the goal, then you “achieve” your goal by carrying the process through, even if it fails to help you progress your language.

    • http://www.fluentin3months.com benny

      Thanks for your thoughts!
      You’re right that the end results are indeed the main goals, but I hope you see that I was trying to indicate that we should be focussed more specifically on processes that add up to those “end goals”, rather than not breaking them up into something achievable in the short-term. I’m saying that we should abandon the end-goal, just that only having that end-goal in mind (and not it’s required parts) is not beneficial.
      I suppose I am playing with semantics a bit, changing “processes” into goals. Would you recommend that I do it differently? :)

      • Cainntear

        No, I’m not saying that the end-results are the main goals, but that you can have sub-goals that are ends in themselves yet not processes.

        Take your example about knowing kitchen vocab.

        Goal: Learn the common kitchen vocabulary by 5pm

        You can then define your measure:

        Measure: Get friend to test you at 5.15. Repeat test in a week

        Once you’ve got your goal and your measure, then you can identify the steps required to achieve it.

        Steps to achieve: [...]

        Mixing goals and processes may work fine for you because you already have a routine, but as a model for readers to copy, it’s sorely lacking because the average reader doesn’t really have any experience of what you want to achieve.

        • http://www.fluentin3months.com benny

          Do you really think so? I don’t think experience is so necessary – I am confident that those reading this page are well able to break up huge tasks into smaller ones.
          I’m sorry, maybe I’m a bit slow today but I don’t actually understand your argument :( I honestly don’t see why having frequent processes (which I have decided to call mini-goals) could only work for me because of my “routine”… We break up large projects all the time. Tidy the house = first hoover the floor, then clean bathroom surfaces, etc. I’m just saying it can work for language processes too. It’s mostly just a mental jump I’m suggesting, no experience necessary :)

          • http://www.anthonylauder.com/ SplogSplog

            I understand what Cainntear is saying. The important point is to define your goal in terms of a measurable result you want to achieve, rather than the steps you are going to take. The goal is the “what?” whereas the process is the “how?”. If you focus mostly on the “how?” then how do you recognize you have actually achieved some result other than just spending time?

            Activities (“process” to use the fancy word) are just peddling unless you are aiming for a target and you can see when you got there.

            “Thirty minutes studying word lists” is an activity. “Learn the months of the year” is a measurable destination.

            Sure, you can break activities down into either smaller activities (“study for 15 minutes” then “take a 5 minute break” then “study for 15 minutes”) but again these are not measurable other than “I spent time on them”.

            In your “clean the house” example, you do have a goal (to have a clean house) and a measurable result (“shiny surfaces”). If you had told somebody “push a mop around for an hour” then you would be talking about activity with no way of knowing if you they achieved anything useful at the end.

            However, time-boxing can be useful to put a bit of pressure on yourself, and to stop you wasting time or getting distracted. So, if you already have a good idea of how much you can reasonably do in a set time, then you can say: “Learn the months of the year (the goal) within 30 minutes (the timebox) by studying word lists (the activity)”. This is then something measurable: “I will know I am done when I can write all 12 list pairs out for myself within one minute, and will know my retention is good enough if twelve hours later I can have a friend read out randomly the names of the months in English and I can respond with their Czech equivalents without noticeable hesitation”

          • http://deleted Cainntear

            We set goals so we can evaluate the effectiveness of our strategies. If the strategy doesn’t help us achieve our goal, we pick new strategies.

            Your learning tasks are the strategy. If your goal is to follow the strategy, then you will always succeed on paper, but that’s not going to guarantee you get anywhere — you need to measure your success independently of whether you followed the process or not to achieve it.

          • http://www.fluentin3months.com benny

            OK, I see from your comments that maybe this method needs a little fine tuning :) I think the basic principle is important (getting satisfaction out of minor tasks or “processes” as well as having the end-goal in mind for these), but obviously there is another way of looking at it I haven’t considered. ;)
            Perhaps combining my method with what you (both) are talking about would involve a structured method of “mini-goals” with a definite plan linking them all together? Otherwise, perhaps you may not be focussing your efforts correctly if you learn something random as my post perhaps suggests.
            I thought my minigoal of a day or two was tight enough, but Iindeed a “time-box” of something very specific to achieve in 30 minutes (or particular time before break) is actually an improvement on this!
            Thanks for your input both of you!! Keep the interesting comments coming ;)

  • nomad

    great post :)

    following on the last set of comments…
    i think the biggest problem for someone would be to decide the size of the progress and the time frame. having measurable results helps to fine tune the magnitude. you could probably sketch something more concrete and measurable step by step, but that is likely to differ between individuals … and languages… anyway?

    good luck with the czech!

  • nomad

    great post :)

    following on the last set of comments…
    i think the biggest problem for someone would be to decide the size of the progress and the time frame. having measurable results helps to fine tune the magnitude. you could probably sketch something more concrete and measurable step by step, but that is likely to differ between individuals … and languages… anyway?

    good luck with the czech!

  • Suada

    I thought this might be useful to you. I found it quite inspiring.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6f237bj1hkI

  • Suada

    I thought this might be useful to you. I found it quite inspiring.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6f237bj1hkI

  • Pingback: わたしのもくとき – My Goals « Apokaripusu Now.